Everyone is welcome here. That is the ground this work stands on. Conscious kink and designer relationships are not the domain of any particular gender, body, orientation, or identity. The patterns described in this language belong to anyone who recognises themselves in them.

At the same time, I want to be honest about where I am standing. I am a cis-gender, white, middle-aged man, coming from a predominantly heterosexual frame of reference. I have done my best to write this language in ways that are non-gendered, inclusive, and relevant across a wide range of identities and relationship structures. Acknowledging that I have blind spots the size of my own privilege, and that there are things I will have missed, framings that will have landed wrongly maybe or assumptions that crept in without my noticing.

For deeper and more rigorous thinking on inclusivity, gender diversity, and consent in kink spaces, I point you toward the work of Wilrieke Sophia — a sex and intimacy educator, conscious kink facilitator, and intimacy activist based in the Netherlands, whose work on radical self-inclusion, impeccable consent, and queer and gender-inclusive approaches to tantra and kink is some of the most careful and grounded in this field.

If you find something on this site that misses the mark — in language, in framing, in assumption — I genuinely want to know. Not defensively, but because this language is alive and it should grow in the direction of greater accuracy and greater welcome.

On not knowing

'How can you teach when you've got so much to learn?'
— Strawbs

I fully acknowledge that I know that I don't know. Lao-tse said: those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. And here we are. I consider myself a student, of the school of life if you will. The patterns here are drawn from years of practice and genuine engagement with the questions — and from someone who has not arrived. Feedback is welcome because of that, not despite it.

Share your feedback

Spotted a typo? Found a pattern that feels exclusionary? Have a suggestion for how something could be framed more accurately or more inclusively? Please write. Every message is read, and most of them are useful.

Feedback on language, inclusivity, patterns, or anything else on this site is always welcome.

Share your feedback →